Peer Review Process

Ensuring Excellence Through Rigorous Evaluation

Our Review Process

Biomedicasphere follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest quality of published research. Our expert reviewers evaluate each submission for scientific merit, methodology, and contribution to the field.

Review Timeline

1. Submission

Authors submit manuscripts through our online submission system

Day 1

2. Initial Review

Editorial team conducts initial screening for scope and quality

3-5 Days

3. Peer Review

Expert reviewers evaluate methodology, results, and significance

4-6 Weeks

4. Decision

Editorial decision communicated with detailed feedback

1-2 Days

Review Criteria

Scientific Merit: Originality and significance of research
Methodology: Appropriate design and statistical analysis
Clarity: Clear presentation and logical flow
Ethics: Compliance with ethical standards
References: Appropriate citation of relevant literature

Possible Outcomes

Accept Manuscript accepted with minor or no revisions

Minor Revision Acceptance pending minor corrections

Major Revision Significant changes required, re-review needed

Reject Manuscript does not meet publication standards

Note: All decisions include detailed reviewer comments to help authors improve their work.

For Reviewers

Expert Reviewers

We invite leading researchers and practitioners in biomedical sciences to serve as reviewers for our journal.

Time Commitment

Reviewers typically spend 2-4 hours evaluating a manuscript and have 3-4 weeks to complete their review.

Recognition

Reviewers receive certificates of appreciation and are acknowledged in our annual reviewer recognition program.

Ethics and Standards

Confidentiality

All submissions are treated with strict confidentiality. Reviewers are required to maintain confidentiality and not share or discuss manuscripts under review.

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must declare any conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts where conflicts exist.

Bias-Free Review

Our double-blind process ensures that reviewer decisions are based solely on scientific merit, not author identity or affiliation.

Constructive Feedback

Reviewers provide constructive, respectful feedback that helps authors improve their work, regardless of the final decision.

Questions About Our Review Process?

Contact our editorial office for any questions about the peer review process or to volunteer as a reviewer.

Contact Editorial Office More Information